Torts Week 5 Ind Work Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Torts Week 5 Ind Work - Research Paper Example In addition to this, during the court session evidence provided does not show any signs of damage. The driver of the truck bore witness that spare tire has been wrapped around by the chains to stop even tighter to the cradle. Yes, now plaintiff can get help by using the common law. This law is particularly developed as a separate doctrine in order to assist the plaintiffs to verify their cases for any particular conditions. The strict liability doctrine apportions the presupposition of obligation certainly for different types of incidents to the suspect rather than of the plaintiff (Anonymous, n.d.). This law relieves the duty of proving a disputed charge that generally builds upon the plaintiff when hearing a case. The courts considered blasting and keeping wild animals, for instance, as an unsafe activity in an inherent manner. There developed a presupposition that if an accident due to blasting occurs or a wild animal ran away than whosoever created the explosion or the possessor of the animal was automatically legally responsible for any harm that could normally be associated to these cases. Therefore this law increased the social cost to individuals that are engaged in unsafe activities (Anonymous,

ARGUMENT Essay on The Medical (health care) of America

ARGUMENT on The Medical (health care) of America - Essay Example One of the most urgent questions is whether all the Americans should be entitled to health care or not. The US is known to be one of few highly-developed nations which do not provide universal health care for its citizens. Together with Mexico, the US is the only member of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development that does not have this service (OECD, 2013). Thus, advocates of the reform insist that health care should be defined as a universal system, run by the government. In other words, this should be the government’s responsibility, but not one of the concerns of ordinary people. Nowadays, however, American  people must work really hard in order to take care of their own health. The burden of all the medical expenses lies on the shoulders of ordinary citizens. According to the US Census Bureau, government programs cover only 27.8% of the population (83  million),  including the elderly, disabled, children, veterans, and some of the poor (U.S. Census Bureau, 2013). In addition, national law provides public access to the services of emergency, without regard to paying capacity of a person. However, this does not seem to be right that all the other people have to take care about their health on their own. A couple of arguments may illustrate this. Despite the significant and really impressive advances in medical sciences, millions of Americans cannot afford themselves a number of modern services just because the price is too high. It seems to be a paradox that citizens of one of the riches countries in the world cannot afford qualitative health services. That is why medical health care, one of the unalienable human rights by the way, seems to be turned into a privilege. Advocates of the right for health care insist that no one in the richest nation on earth should go without it (Right to Health Care, 2014). The US seems to be wealthy